Municipal Bonds: What’s Behind the Recent Weakness

George Rudawski, MSFE, MBA, CFA Managing Partner & Senior Portfolio Manager Asset Management Group

George

“The long-term case for municipal bonds remains intact. Credit quality across most issuers is strong, and the fundamental role of munis in delivering tax-advantaged income endures”

 

Municipal bonds, long valued for their tax-exempt income and relative stability, have recently lagged other areas of the fixed income market. Year-to-date through June the Bloomberg Muni Bond Index is down 0.3%. For investors who rely on Munis as a foundation of tax-efficient income and capital preservation, this underperformance has raised questions. To understand what’s driving these results, it’s important to examine the current economic and market dynamics shaping the muni bond landscape.

 

Municipal bonds typically carry longer durations than other fixed income sectors, which makes them more vulnerable to rising interest rates. While many investors expected a more accommodative Federal Reserve policy in 2024, persistent inflationary pressures and delayed rate cuts have kept long-term Treasury yields elevated. This has disproportionately impacted muni bond prices, particularly on the longer end of the curve. 

 

After a period of relatively muted issuance, municipalities are re-entering the market with a greater supply of new bonds. This resurgence, driven by infrastructure spending needs and opportunistic refinancing, has not been met with equivalent demand. With Treasury and corporate yields now offering compelling alternatives, retail investor appetite for munis has softened.

 

Selling munis during tax season has also long been a factor. The annual need for liquidity during tax season often triggers a wave of redemptions in tax-sensitive bond funds. This year, the effect was more acute. Mutual fund outflows and individual selling to cover tax obligations added to technical weakness just as new supply hit the market, amplifying price declines and temporary volatility in the sector.

 

Adding to the unease is the growing concern around potential changes to the tax treatment of municipal bonds. With national debt levels climbing and both political parties discussing sweeping tax reforms, investors are increasingly sensitive to any signals that tax-exempt status could be curtailed for high earners. Even speculative headlines about limiting deductions or taxing muni interest above certain income thresholds can lead to selling pressure, as investors reassess the risk-reward profile of this traditionally stable asset class.

 

The “Big Beautiful Bill” is a sweeping tax and spending package with potential implications for municipal bonds. While it preserves the tax-exempt status that makes munis attractive to investors, other provisions could affect the broader bond market and limit the ability of counties to finance infrastructure. In the face of these concerns, municipal bonds continue to offer tax-efficient income and play a vital role in a well-constructed fixed income strategy.

 

Despite these recent challenges, municipal bonds continue to offer powerful long-term benefits, especially for high-income investors. These include federally tax-exempt interest income (and often state tax exemption as well), historically low default rates, and a wide array of maturities and credit profiles to align with specific financial goals.

 

Conclusion

 

The long-term case for municipal bonds remains intact. Credit quality across most issuers is strong, and the fundamental role of munis in delivering tax-advantaged income endures. Like all markets, the muni space is subject to cyclical pressures and evolving policy narratives. Understanding these forces helps to put short-term underperformance into context and reinforces the value of staying focused on long-term objectives.